The information Candace Baumgartner supplied from her investigation of this incident is on page 2 of this document. I will be going over all of the fraudulent information to her out right lies and her own contradiction she put in this report. Isn't it amazing how CPS workers twist facts, tell outright lies and contradict themselves to promote their own agenda's? .
1. This incident didn't happen on the evening of June 13, 2005, it happened on June 14, 2005 during the day.
2. Erica was not living in the apartment at this time. She moved back to her house June 10, 2005.
3. We never had any "agreement" with foster care. The only rule we were ever told, no boyfriend contact with the children, which we were informed about on May 18-19, 2006. Brian and Candace were both told the contents of the message that Erica left on our answering machine from June 14, 2005, which was the day before this investigation was started. They both knew we had punished Erica for letting the boyfriend have contact with the children and coming over to our property.
4. This part is an out right lie by Candace, the only agreement that was made during this meeting was if our daughter wans to visit her children from now on it has to be supervised at DHS.
5. The children were not 3 and 1 years of age. Lets try 5 and 2 at the time of this investigation. Alyssa could speak really well for her age, Amber had the speech problems
6. How can Candace determine if a child can't tell the difference between the truth and a lie, when she doesn't seem to be able to tell the truth herself?
7. Candace was told exactly the reason this was happening and it had nothing to do with visitations. Both our daughter and her boyfriend had their criminal cases finished. They didn't get anything as far as punishment. Erica thinks she will get her children back if she tells enough lies to have these girls removed from our care.
8. I never once admitted I am smoking marijuana. I told Brian I did it in the past when he asked me about it.
9. We were never once supplied with a supervised visit schedule. How could there be a schedule when we were told Erica can live with us and her children? We never learn our daughter was supposed to have supervised visits until 2 days after this investigation started. We did learn sometime later there was a "parent agency agreement" and none of the contents in this "agreement" were ever discussed with us. I will be going over this "agreement" later on.