If our daughter actually brought up the sex abuse accusation, isn't it fair to believe this would be a major concerns long before we started this adoption? DHS used every lie they could think of to remove the children from our home.  This is something that was never mentioned in court or any documents that were presented to the court. In fact just the opposite were true.

 

     During our adoption assessment this was never mentioned until after Bethany (Suzanne Adams, Dave Glerum) and DHS/CPS (Char Anderson, Lacy Gonzales-Borstler) had a case conference September 6, 2006.

     During our initial meeting with Suzanne she told us CPS has no role in this assessment , "Their only role is the foster care of these children." So then why was there this case conference? I will tell you the reasons. They thought my drug assessment would come back negative, but it didn't. They thought I was going to be seeing one of their paid psychologists. CPS needed a way to eliminate us from adopting altogether. What better way then to bring up a false sex abuse accusation and let their paid psychologist use this as a concern in his report?

 

     I know this accusation is false and as I stated in my letter to the Ombudsman office I am prepared to take a polygraph to show just that.

 

Now here are my reason why I assert this was brought up by CPS as a way to eliminate us from adopting.

 

     1. This was not in the original report Suzanne received from CPS or it would have been mention from the

         very beginning of this adoption assessment. It would have and should be a very major concern.

     2. The first meeting with Suzanne we are told CPS has no role in this assessment. Yet they have a case

         conference.

     3. Prior to the case conference between Bethany and CPS on Sept. 6, 2006 this was never mentioned.

     4. Suzanne already had 3 contacts with the original psychologist and faxed him her concerns. Why was

         there another contact the same day as this case conference with CPS? Was he given a referral as to

         what they wanted in his report?

     5. Sept. 11, 2006 we now have a slim chance of adopting. 

     6. Sept. 13, 2006 Suzanne learns I am having the psychological evaluation elsewhere.

     7. Oct. 2, 2006 Suzanne told me she isn't going to use this sex abuse accusation because there is no

         evidence. So why the change between we have a "slim chance" to she isn't going to use it?  The only thing

         that changed was I was no longer going to one of CPS's paid psychologists.  Was he suppose to provide

         this evidence? 

     8. There is no mention of sex abuse in any of the CPS reports or court transcripts. In fact just the

         opposite is true,  "No evidence of sexual abuse".

     9. Suzanne authored the child adoption assessment which was signed October 10, 2006. In this report she

         states the exact same thing I told our daughter May 2004 when this I was going to take the children over

         to Amber's grandfather. She states the exact same thing I told Dan Morgan and this was the reason I

         request counseling for the girls. She states the exact same thing I told Brian Vanderzalm. She states the

         exact same thing I told her during our home study September 13, 2006. But now it is being directed at me.

  

So now where did this accusation come from? That right, CMH, the same place Nicole and her friends work.

"However, in the September 2005, psychological intake completed by the local County Mental Health (CMH) Center, she stated that she thought that her father might have sexually abused the girls. According to the mother, Alyssa has pulled down her sister's pants and was caught kissing her sister's bottom. The girl's mother said she believes that Alyssa could have been sexually abused while she left Alyssa in the grandfather's care. She reported this to CMH and to DHS." Children's adoption assessment page 2.

Amazing is all I can say. DHS supposedly knew about this false accusation some time ago yet it is never mentioned until the case conference with Bethany on September 6, 2006.

It was I that informed Erica and Brain Vanderzalm about this. When we had a talk with Alyssa about the kissing/smelling of the bottom incident, Alyssa told us she saw mom doing it. Here is a passage from the Court Report Brian Vanderzalm authored.

"Alyssa has been observed to exhibit some concerning behavior. She has been observed smelling Amber's buttock. She also has made some concerning statements. She told Mr. and Mrs. Atwood she saw mom having sex". Court Report  6/18/2005    

"Additionally, it is possible, according to the girls' mother, that Alyssa and/or Amber may have been sexually abused by their maternal grandfather. In foster. care, Alyssa was caught humping stuffed animals several times. As noted above, the mother reported that Alyssa has pulled down her sister's pants and was caught kissing the sister's bottom. The mother said she believes that they could have been sexually abused when she left them in the grandfather's care about two years ago. She said that Alyssa screamed and cried at the mention of a visit with the grandfather." Children's Adoption Assessment Page 5.

Alyssa was caught humping stuffed animals? Of course this couldn't have happened from seeing her mother having sex. Or maybe something happened while in foster care? Of course Suzanne has to make it sound like it has something to do with me. After all she is suppose to deny us the privilege of adopting our granddaughters.

Now lets get real, it was I that told Dan Morgan during our first meeting March 15, 2005 about the incident when I was going to take the children over to Amber's grandfather. This was when Alyssa begged and pleaded of not wanting to go over there with tears in her eyes. This was the main reason I requested counseling for the girls. I also told Brian Vanderzalm about that incident during our first meeting. This was told to our daughter in 2004. I also told Suzanne about this incident during our home study September 13, 2006. During this home study I blamed this accusation on my daughter. Now Suzanne is saying the same thing and saying it came from my daughter and now it is being directed towards me.

This is just more of Suzanne's fraudulent information she used to try and keep us from adopting.